DepEd 3rd Quarter Periodical Tests/Exams with TOS Grades 1-6 All Subjects


DepEd 3rd Quarter Periodical Tests/Exams with TOS Grades 1-6 All Subjects


What is Periodical Test?

A test or examination (informally, exam or evaluation) is an assessment intended to measure a test-taker’s knowledge, skill, aptitude, physical fitness, or classification in many other topics (e.g., beliefs). [wikipedia]

Periodical tests as classroom appraisal is among an instructor’s most fundamental instructive devices. At the point when legitimately created and translated, appraisals can enable instructors to all the more likely comprehend what their understudies are realizing. By giving the way to accumulate proof about what understudies know and can do, classroom evaluation can encourage instructors:

  • Distinguish understudies’ qualities and shortcomings
  • Screen understudy learning and advancement
  • Plan and direct guidance

Progressing casual and formal classroom appraisal is the bond that holds instructing and realizing together that enables instructors to screen encouraging adequacy and understudy learning. It can rouse and shape learning and guidance, can enable instructors to measure understudy authority of required abilities, can enable educators to decide if understudies are set up for tests that are utilized for high-stakes choices and can enable understudies to enhance their own exhibitions

Classroom appraisals accomplish something other than measure learning. What we survey, how we evaluate, and how we impart the outcomes send an unmistakable message to understudies about what merits realizing, how it ought to be educated, and how well we anticipate that them should perform. Connecting appraisal and guidance is basic to compelling learning.

Structuring useful evaluations requires key arranging and a reasonable comprehension of one’s appraisal objectives. What should be evaluated and why? When arranging instructional procedures, educators need to remember learning objectives, think about appraisal systems and figure out what might comprise proof that understudies have achieved the learning objectives.

The majority of this should be considered inside the setting of guidance, instead of as a disconnected advance in the guidance cycle. To capitalize on appraisals, you have to realize how to pick the correct one for every circumstance, and how to make that test as successful as could be allowed. An ineffectively picked or inadequately created appraisal will neglect to give helpful proof about understudy learning. It could even give misdirecting data. Just with great, appropriately picked evaluations will instructors assemble proof of what their understudies have realized.

You can start to make a procedure for creating and utilizing classroom appraisals by asking the accompanying fundamental yet basic inquiries:

  • What am I endeavoring to get some answers concerning my understudies’ learning?
  • What realizing objectives or results would I like to quantify?
  • What sort of proof do I have to demonstrate that my understudies have accomplished the objectives that I’m endeavoring to gauge?
  • What sort of appraisal will give me that proof?

Make it precise and fitting. Above all, an appraisal must give the proof it was intended to give. The appraisal must quantify the information, aptitudes, or potentially capacities the instructor accepts are critical. In the event that the objective is to test for maintenance of certainties, a verifiable test (e.g., a different decision or fill-in-the-clear appraisal) might be the best decision. Estimating understudies’ theoretical comprehension or capacity to perform errands ordinarily requires increasingly complex types of appraisal, for example, execution evaluations. Great proof enhances guidance.

The National Assessment System of K to 12 Education Program Deped

National assessment is a country-wide collection of information on what students know, understand, and perform. The result of national assessment can be used by individual students as a basis on where to proceed in the next step in the educational ladder or can be used by educators for making an informed decision about what to do next in the educational process. Before the implementation of the K to 12 education program, students took the National Achievement Test (NAT) which provided information to schools, divisions, regions, and the country as to the level of academic achievement of Filipino students in elementary (taken at Grade 6) and in high school (taken at Year 2) level. In the K to 12, national assessments will be conducted at the end of each level of schooling elementary, junior high school, and senior high school. Moreover, there will be summative assessment at the national level conducted at the end of Grade 3 to determine the impact of the use of mother tongue as medium of instruction. The assessment in Grade 12 is conceived to accomplish several purposes such as to assess the achievement of the K to 12 standards and to serve as college entrance examination.